Last week, while on my quest to find Sir G, I encountered a board covered with sheets of dilapidated Manila paper. A bulletin board. Two seemingly official papers were pinned on the upper-left of it. While the opposite space was taken up by torn pages from the Philippine Collegian (the University's official school paper). Opinions by various students were scribbled on the lower half. And I was put on halt when I read the words fastfood chains. I saw HRIM {Hotel, Restaurant and Institution Management} as I skimmed through it. And I just had to read the whole article.
It was about the HRIM Department's new affiliation program. And, oh, I have to give it to the writer. She was brilliant. She authored an article bloated with lopsidedness. But I will get to the issue of irresponsible journalism in a few paragraphs.
Two semesters ago, I had to undergo a 30-hour training in a UFS {University Foodservice}. It was a course requirement. And I had to juggle that with a couple of major units that also required me to ignore my body's need for rest. We were conducting functions every month. We were required to do written and oral reports every other day. We had quizzes everyday. School was practically killing us but we got through it. Then, the semester after, we needed to work 60 hours in the UFS. Plus, the usual drill: quizess and reports. And Catering that almost robbed me of my sanity. I was always so tired but I loved what I was doing. All the work got me really fired up subconsciously. I was being taught how to become confident, and how to use that esteem to recognize my own potentials.
While, I was away, the department implemented a new program that not only requires the students to work for the UFS but also for three outside foodservices. Namely, Jollibee, Shakey's and Figaro. The set-up: each student will work 80 hours for each establishment. If I understood it correctly, this would happen on the four final semesters, a different establishment every semester. And during their senior year, the students would be given a chance to hold managerial positions, where the company would also provide a stipend. Sounds good, right?
Yes, in fact, it very much does. Heck, I would even work for free. But I would have to think about neglecting my other academic responsibilities. The activity is very sadistic and I am not exaggerating. Even only a required 60-hour training alongside my major subjects was toxic enough and, now, 80 hours? Plus, these establishments are not located inside the University. My monetary needs would increase for I would have to make additional commutation.
It was a mistake when the faculty did not ask for the students' opinion on this project. Where did democracy go? I read that an orientation was conducted but what happened to the consultation part?
There was this one thought written on the freedom board that talked about the training not being appropriate for HRIM students. Since tasks such as washing the dishes and mopping the floor would be assigned. And, obviously, whoever wrote it had no idea what he/she was talking about. She argued that HRIM is a management course, sure, that's what the M stands for after all. But everybody knows how essential the knowledge of a manager is in leading an establishment. Every good leader should know the basic operations of what he/she has been assigned to lead. And that's why we're being taught the basics in the industry. Oh, cleaning tables and waiting on others don't look spiffy and fun at all, but a good career must be built on a strong, detailed foundation. You can't just get hired as an executive without knowing the basics. And even if you do, you'll have to go through one hell of a learning process to become good in your field. We all have to start from the bottom.
In the hospitality industry, you don't just deal with food and travel. You don't just dress up and play Ms. Pretty Face, you work with people. People to lead and people to please. You can't pretend to be the boss, you have to be the boss. You should know everything there is to know. Leaders are supposed to be the experts in their fields. Competence comes with experience
It has also been argued that Jollibee, Shakey's and Figaro are taking advantage of the students. Utilizing them as cheap labor. And, well, I admit that also crossed my mind. In the article, an activist pointed out that UP students are given the education they've been privileged to receive because they are suppose to use it to serve the people and not the magnates. But hey, look, if we're just going to limit our learning inside the university, if we are just going to train in the UFS, how do you suppose we enrich our knowledge? Let me see, outdated equipment and facilities, and the inadequate market? It's not a rich school. A laboratory without even a decent oven? Decades old equipment. The students need to get out there and learn. You can't just depend on theories and just imagine the real world. That's not fun. xP It's better to be out there. It's better and will be easier to serve the people if we are equipped with the right tools.
The training should also become very handy after graduation. It will be easier to get hired if your curriculum vitae brags of several working experiences. It's mostly about competition and we should be able to compete.
This was made a controversy because an HRIM student complained to the Philippine Collegian. I understand her concern. But if I were in her position, I would grab the opportunity. No other school gives this much to their students. They should consider themselves lucky. You'll get through it. It's school, we all get through it if we try. And it's Jollibee! The biggest and most competitive QSR chain in the country. It's Figaro, the biggest Filipino-owned coffee company. Shakey's? I don't know much about it. It's pizza! Haha. xD
To hell with being taken advantage of. I trust our faculty. They have nothing in mind other than giving their students the best education they can give. Seriously, this is for your own good. I'm pretty sure you'll thank them one day. Theories are good, but theories supported by extensive experience? Much, much better.
Okay, now, irresponsible journalism. The HRIM representative was interviewed regarding the issue. To sum up his statement: the new program is actually a very good idea if we set aside the fact that the students would have a hard time managing their already damned schedule. And the author failed to include his views. The article made it sound like the whole student body is rallying against the department, which is very untrue because there is also a group which approves of the implementation. The department is not completely wrong.
So, I say, recess the program. Conduct a better study to improve it. And involve the students.
Now, back to my practicum case analyses. Ta-ta
It was about the HRIM Department's new affiliation program. And, oh, I have to give it to the writer. She was brilliant. She authored an article bloated with lopsidedness. But I will get to the issue of irresponsible journalism in a few paragraphs.
Two semesters ago, I had to undergo a 30-hour training in a UFS {University Foodservice}. It was a course requirement. And I had to juggle that with a couple of major units that also required me to ignore my body's need for rest. We were conducting functions every month. We were required to do written and oral reports every other day. We had quizzes everyday. School was practically killing us but we got through it. Then, the semester after, we needed to work 60 hours in the UFS. Plus, the usual drill: quizess and reports. And Catering that almost robbed me of my sanity. I was always so tired but I loved what I was doing. All the work got me really fired up subconsciously. I was being taught how to become confident, and how to use that esteem to recognize my own potentials.
While, I was away, the department implemented a new program that not only requires the students to work for the UFS but also for three outside foodservices. Namely, Jollibee, Shakey's and Figaro. The set-up: each student will work 80 hours for each establishment. If I understood it correctly, this would happen on the four final semesters, a different establishment every semester. And during their senior year, the students would be given a chance to hold managerial positions, where the company would also provide a stipend. Sounds good, right?
Yes, in fact, it very much does. Heck, I would even work for free. But I would have to think about neglecting my other academic responsibilities. The activity is very sadistic and I am not exaggerating. Even only a required 60-hour training alongside my major subjects was toxic enough and, now, 80 hours? Plus, these establishments are not located inside the University. My monetary needs would increase for I would have to make additional commutation.
It was a mistake when the faculty did not ask for the students' opinion on this project. Where did democracy go? I read that an orientation was conducted but what happened to the consultation part?
There was this one thought written on the freedom board that talked about the training not being appropriate for HRIM students. Since tasks such as washing the dishes and mopping the floor would be assigned. And, obviously, whoever wrote it had no idea what he/she was talking about. She argued that HRIM is a management course, sure, that's what the M stands for after all. But everybody knows how essential the knowledge of a manager is in leading an establishment. Every good leader should know the basic operations of what he/she has been assigned to lead. And that's why we're being taught the basics in the industry. Oh, cleaning tables and waiting on others don't look spiffy and fun at all, but a good career must be built on a strong, detailed foundation. You can't just get hired as an executive without knowing the basics. And even if you do, you'll have to go through one hell of a learning process to become good in your field. We all have to start from the bottom.
In the hospitality industry, you don't just deal with food and travel. You don't just dress up and play Ms. Pretty Face, you work with people. People to lead and people to please. You can't pretend to be the boss, you have to be the boss. You should know everything there is to know. Leaders are supposed to be the experts in their fields. Competence comes with experience
It has also been argued that Jollibee, Shakey's and Figaro are taking advantage of the students. Utilizing them as cheap labor. And, well, I admit that also crossed my mind. In the article, an activist pointed out that UP students are given the education they've been privileged to receive because they are suppose to use it to serve the people and not the magnates. But hey, look, if we're just going to limit our learning inside the university, if we are just going to train in the UFS, how do you suppose we enrich our knowledge? Let me see, outdated equipment and facilities, and the inadequate market? It's not a rich school. A laboratory without even a decent oven? Decades old equipment. The students need to get out there and learn. You can't just depend on theories and just imagine the real world. That's not fun. xP It's better to be out there. It's better and will be easier to serve the people if we are equipped with the right tools.
The training should also become very handy after graduation. It will be easier to get hired if your curriculum vitae brags of several working experiences. It's mostly about competition and we should be able to compete.
This was made a controversy because an HRIM student complained to the Philippine Collegian. I understand her concern. But if I were in her position, I would grab the opportunity. No other school gives this much to their students. They should consider themselves lucky. You'll get through it. It's school, we all get through it if we try. And it's Jollibee! The biggest and most competitive QSR chain in the country. It's Figaro, the biggest Filipino-owned coffee company. Shakey's? I don't know much about it. It's pizza! Haha. xD
To hell with being taken advantage of. I trust our faculty. They have nothing in mind other than giving their students the best education they can give. Seriously, this is for your own good. I'm pretty sure you'll thank them one day. Theories are good, but theories supported by extensive experience? Much, much better.
Okay, now, irresponsible journalism. The HRIM representative was interviewed regarding the issue. To sum up his statement: the new program is actually a very good idea if we set aside the fact that the students would have a hard time managing their already damned schedule. And the author failed to include his views. The article made it sound like the whole student body is rallying against the department, which is very untrue because there is also a group which approves of the implementation. The department is not completely wrong.
So, I say, recess the program. Conduct a better study to improve it. And involve the students.
Now, back to my practicum case analyses. Ta-ta
Current Location: Mandaluyong Apartment
Current Mood:
awake
Current Music: Put Your Head on My Shoulder - Michael Buble
11 | Comment
